📽️ The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King purchase, purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie online , purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King download , buy The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie, purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King online, purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King purchase movie 2003, where can i purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King DVD 📀, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King money can buy, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie 2003 purchase 🎬.
Purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) Movie Online and Download - Peter Jackson 🎥
Year:
2003
Country:
USA, New Zealand, Germany
Genre:
Drama, Action, Adventure, Fantasy
IMDB rating:
8.9
Director:
Peter Jackson
Noel Appleby as Everard Proudfoot
Sean Astin as Sam
David Aston as Gondorian Soldier 3
John Bach as Madril
Sean Bean as Boromir
Cate Blanchett as Galadriel
Orlando Bloom as Legolas
Billy Boyd as Pippin
Sadwyn Brophy as Eldarion
Marton Csokas as Celeborn
Richard Edge as Gondorian Soldier 1
Jason Fitch as Uruk 2
Storyline: While Frodo & Sam continue to approach Mount Doom to destroy the One Ring, unaware of the path Gollum is leading them, the former Fellowship aid Rohan & Gondor in a great battle in the Pelennor Fields, Minas Tirith and the Black Gates as Sauron wages his last war against Middle-Earth.
Type Resolution File Size Codec Bitrate Format
1080p 1920x1080 px 19109 Mb mpeg4 10151 Kbps mp4 Purchase
HQ DVD-rip 640x272 px 2090 Mb mpeg4 696 Kbps avi Purchase
DVD-rip 640x272 px 796 Mb h264 128 Kbps mkv Purchase
iPhone 640x360 px 2257 Mb h264 1569 Kbps mp4 Purchase
Reviews
Just perfect
I watch all movies (about 12 hours) in one shot every year. I have movies and all books. I read all of them. I never bored because this world is amazing and magnificent. Thank you Tolkien and thank you Peter Jackson I will watch with my sons and grandsons.I watch all movies (about 12 hours) in one shot every year. I have movies and all books. I read all of them. I never bored because this world is amazing and magnificent. Thank you Tolkien and thank you Peter Jackson I will watch with my sons and grandsons.
2017-03-27
Depth
Spoilers herein.

This raises the bar on production values, as it certainly is competently made, say, compared to the `Star Wars' stuff. It seems oddly paced, lacking a rhythm, and more importantly lacking the patina of magic that colored the first two. In fact, everything seems brighter this time out.

Unlike the battle of the second, they have decided to not have any movie jokes, like the surfer/warrior who winks at the camera. But there is still a variety in tone from place to place as if different directors were involved. I suppose that's true.

I remarked on the earlier films that they innovated primarily in how they use the vertical dimension. This third film is even more competent and extreme in that regard. They knew it was a discriminator and exploited it. Unfortunately, the towers and cities and mountain gates all have an unnatural sameness to them, they are photographed with huge vertical sweeps. Even the first ending where everyone bows to the hobbits and there is the obligatory `helicopter' shot, it goes shockingly far beyond what one expects. The way it pulls back fast and swoops reminds that we are used to an eye that is constrained by the aerodynamics of light helicopters.

Not so here. When this is considered in hindsight, I'm pretty sure that the high production values won't be noticed; that all the effects and conventions here – especially the battle scenes – will be seen as borrowed, all except for the exhilarating use of height. That's worth watching. Magic of its own.

That magic is enough to carry this project for me. It is clearly Jackson's intent to move his camera in great vertical arcs, usually in ways that no physical camera could. That gives us a fantastic eye. Just a few hours later, I saw `The Lion King' again and noticed that although they were never constrained by physics, they always moved the `camera' in ways we have seen in ordinary `real' films. That's because `Lion' wanted to look real while `Return' wanted to seem ultrareal.

Ian McKellen has always puzzled me, he's sort of a working man's John Gielgud, an engineer of the spoken word. Here, he stoops to Alec Guiness' role. A sad way to cap a career.

Ted's Evaluation: 3 of 3 – Worth watching
2003-12-28
My objective and unhyped view? Stunning. Simply stunning.
Frodo and Sam continue their quest to destroy the ring, led by the untrustworthy Gollum. Meanwhile the rest of the Fellowship prepare for another battle to hold a human city against an onslaught of orcs.

If you check my other reviews you will note that I wasn't a massive fan of the first two films - I loved them, but was not blind to their faults. However, let me just lay my cards out here, I was totally blown away by this film. For the vast majority (and more of that later) the narrative flowed really well where the other two films had struggled to really keep consistent. Here the various strands work well together and, while characters have only brief times to tell stories, on the whole it manages it well. I got the feeling that the film really let rip - it knew this was the ending and it did feel that everything came together in a collection of noise and energy which really made it feel like the final part of a trilogy rather than just a stand alone film.

The one area where the film really stutters (and actually caused people to leave the cinema in annoying numbers) is ironically the place where Jackson is true to the book, and that's the final 20 minutes. There is a clear scene where the film ends, however it then runs for another 20 minutes - which is a mix of scenes that all fade out like they were the end. To Joe Public (ie me!) I would have been happy not to have all the loose ends tied up in the way the book does it - the film should have ended on a high (with the King being crowned etc) but instead it seems to crawl to an end in a way that is not in line with the momentum of the film (if not the whole trilogy!) This problem is minor on the grand scheme of things, but I would rather have left the cinema on my high than be made to wonder `when's this ending? Is this the end now? Oh, maybe this is it now?' - but I do understand why it was done this way.

The cast, as they have been all the way, are excellent. Wood's Frodo changes well during this film while Astin is touching in his portrayal of unerring friendship. Bloom and Rhys-Davis had less to do but came into their own during the battle scenes - adding both action and the odd comic touch (`that still counts as one' being accepted by the audience as a chance to break the tension). Mortensen is the title character and serves it well, with McKellen also continuing his strong role. I could list through the whole cast but I will stick with noting two things. Firstly, both Monaghan and Boyd had bigger and more meaningful roles and rose to them well. Secondly I continue with my belief from the second film that Serkis is the stand out actor of the trilogy. His Gollum is so much more than an effect - he is tragic, fearsome, hateful and funny. Praise of course goes to the special effects for making this character tell so much with an expression but to pretend that the work of the actor is secondary to the character (as opposed the look) is foolish. He deserved one for Two Towers so I hope an Oscar goes his way. It was a shame to not have screen time for Lee but the film works well without him and it was a brave move by the editors.

The special effects do not stand out - and that's a compliment. Even in state of the art movies of late I have been aware that I could be watching a video game. Here I only occasionally noticed that things were clear computer effects, even though the majority of the film was! This is how they SHOULD be used - not as a draw in their own right but as part of the film. Whether it be the massive battle scenes that are spectacular or the animated spider or just the fact that I forget that Gollum is only an effect, I cannot fault it's use of effects or the sheer visual feast that is this film.

I have tried not to gush because there will be plenty of others to do that without me joining them, but it is hard to really fault this film. It is the strongest of the trilogy and brings it all together really well, it is an emotional event more than a film and, if Jackson needs 20 minutes of slow closure to finish it to his satisfaction then I can give him that in return for all the hours of wonderful cinema that he has given me.
2003-12-25
A legitimately great movie
An adventure movie to match the great ones of the past, and the one to beat for the future. The culmination of this ambitious trilogy is more than fitting; it surpasses the first two films by quite a distance. Almost nothing disappointed or bothered me. All parts of the story were equally interesting. It was sweeping, it was involving, it was beautiful. One of the few thing I would complain about is the villain. Sauron is boring and more or less unseen. He does not feel very threatening. And his army of orcs has been dull since the first film. They're just not very interesting creatures. Fortunately, The Return of the King really makes up for these monsters with a gallery of better ones. Some of them have been present in the other two films, trolls and those flying dragons that the ring wraiths ride on. They're more present here, however. Even better, though, those gigantic elephants, ten times the size of a normal one. Oh, man, those are cool. Star Wars fans might grumble that they were too much like the AT-AT walkers from Empire, and they are. One scene where Legolas, the elf, triumphs over one of them feels like a sped up version of Luke Skywalker's attack. But the very best thing is a giant spider. Everyone knows that there was originally a giant spider on skull island in King Kong, cut from the film because it really disturbed a test audience. Seeing the spider in Return of the King is like having that famous piece of lost footage restored. When all three films are finally out on their special edition DVDs, I'm going to spend a month combing through them to see whether or not the entire series of films isn't just as good as this one, or perhaps as good as many of my younger friends have sworn they were.
2003-12-20
A cut too far.
Warning contains spoiler.

Five years of anticipation and delight are finally over, from the first hints of a cinematic version of the Lord of The Rings to the release of the Return of The King and I have been enthralled by it all.

However, I was amazed that there was no hint of the Houses of the Healing episode or Faramir's romance with Eowyn. Having taken such care to develop her character (brought to life so wonderfully by Miranda Otto)in TTT and RoTK it seemed criminal to leave her on the battlefield - except for a brief glimpse at the end, all smiles next to Faramir as the man she adored kisses another woman! My husband (who has not read the books) left the cinema proclaiming "I don't know what she was laughing about, I thought she was suicidal" leaving me to fill in the missing pieces.

One or two minutes less of Frodo's doleful expression might have allowed for a brief glimpse of the two of them together whilst Aragorn et al marched on the Black Gate or even a shortening of the return to the Shire and journey to the Grey Havens - for heaven's sake get on that boat! I can only hope the missing parts are in the extended dvd.
2004-01-01
Best movie, of the best fictional world ever made
Best movie, of the best fictional world ever made, no doubt that this movie and the franchise itself are marked on the history of movies as the books are, Peter Jackson did a great job giving life to the marvelous work of J.J.R. Tolkien, even going a little bit further than Tolkien in the character development, in resume: 10/10
2017-09-22
Awesome following with amazing visuals and groundbreaking special effects
The third part in Jackson's trilogy based on the novels of J.R.R Tolkien, picking up shortly after the second one left off. This extraordinary film begins with Frodo(Elijah Wood), Sam(Sean Astin) along with Gollum/Smeagol(Andy Serkis) continuing the travel towards Mount Doom, the only place where the Ring can be destroyed. Frodo and Sam care the Ring in order to keep it from falling into the hands of its evil creator. Meantime Gondor is invaded by the Orcs of Mordor and Gandalf(Ian McKellen) and Pippin(Billy Boyd) ride to Minas Tirith. There rules Denethor(John Noble) and father of the deceased Boromir(Sean Bean) and Faramir(David Wenham). While Aragorn(Viggo Mortensen) must to chose among his two lovers, Eowyn(Miranda Otto) and Arwen(Liv Tyler). Aragorn along with Legolas(Orlando Jones), and Gimli(John Rhys Davies) travel to the creepy caves inhabited by the Army of the Dead.

This sensational epic adventure is plenty of action, impressive battles, spectacular drama and is pretty entertaining. Film packs a real sense of wonder and stimulating action set pieces illuminating the full-blown feats of the various protagonists and wind up an overlong battles and a stunning finale. Contains an incredible array of technical visual effects by Weta Digital and Weta Workship among other Cia. Sensational cinematography by Andrew Lesnie and spectacular and sensible musical score by Howard Shore, winning deserved Academy Award. Beautifully realized set design with phenomenal production values. The film provides enough amusement during the three and half hour and stays closer to the novel than any of the former adaptations-mostly animated and low budget- such as the mediocre effort by Ralph Baski. The motion picture will like to Tolkien followers as the neophite who didn't have seen the previous parts and those unfamiliar with the lengthy literary work. Magnificent direction by Peter Jackson bringing stunningly the imaginary world and mythology of Tolkien to life.
2008-01-10
They saved the best for last
Obviously, I'm aware of the fact that the Lord of the Rings trilogy is actually one giant movie, but since it was released in parts, that's how I'm judging them. The Return Of The King is the final chapter, and since it is the climax and resolution of the epic journey, it has a little more intensity and urgency than the previous installments.

At this point everyone has come to know and love all of the characters, and the stakes have become tremendously high. Kingdoms are at their knees, and the only two characters who can save the day are getting weaker and weaker. The tension was very high in this episode and I can honestly say that out of all 3 this was the only one that had me on the edge of my seat. There were many memorable scenes (one of my favourites including the part with the giant spider)that made this the classic that it is sure to stay for decades to come.

This is the longest of the series, mostly because of the ending that seems to last a while. This was a good ending, and I can see why Frodo did what he did. He, and us the audience, have gone through an incredible ordeal and I think we needed that 20 minute linger. When the battle is over, and the celebrations have ended, there is a sad emptiness felt. The films spanned over 3 years, there have been the extended cuts of course, but after that, it's all over. Peter Jackson gave us an ending that was both appropriate and admirable.

These were some amazing movies and this one in particular is the best, in my opinion. As whole, the Lord Of The Rings is a phenomenon. An absolute phenomenon. Much more than just movies. They have a universal appeal and have touched the hearts and imaginations of millions. I'm one of them.

Sorry if I'm being all fanboyish and kissing this movie's ass, but I really admire it. It may not be among my personal favourites but generally this seems to be the movie event of the century. There will never be another Lord of the Rings film, and that's a bit depressing.

My rating: 10/10
2005-03-16
Take this chance while you can.
The Lord of the Rings novel is one of the best English novels of all time, certainly in the top five. The Lord of the Rings trilogy by New Line Cinema will long have similar standings in the realm of movies.

When I was younger, every once in awhile I would sit down on the couch and watch the Star Wars trilogy. Six-and-one-half hours later I would be done and think, `Wow!' Now, after having attended the marathon showing of all three movies of LOTR, I didn't finish the night by thinking, `Wow!' I finished it so overwhelmed I didn't know what to think. It wasn't until the next morning that I could comprehend what I had just experienced the day before. history being made.

Each of these movies is acclaimed for nearly every element of their being. People who were never fantasy fans found themselves in a new world. Those of us who have long been fans still found ourselves in a new world. I have read many of the comments others have made, and I would like to address one issue in particular.

No movie will ever be exactly like the book it is based on (nor should it). That's why movies often begin with `Based on the novel.' or `Inspired by.' Screenwriters must take certain liberties in adapting a novel for the screen. Very often parts must be rewritten or entirely left out. Peter Jackson's LOTR is his vision of the novels. And it is a glorious vision.

I am a fan of the books and of the movies. They are two different entities. The Return of the King is my second favorite. I love the Fellowship most and the Two Towers least. If I gave these movies grades they would be 98 for Fellowship, 97 for Return of the King, and 95 for Two Towers. They aren't perfect, but my idea of perfection is not Peter Jackson's or anyone else's.

There is something in this movie for almost everyone; love, friendship, huge conflicts, anger, despair, fear, and hope. If you never see this movie while it is the theatre you are missing out on an experience of a lifetime. I have pledged to myself to see it at least once a week while it is in the theatres here. If the first two movies were still out I would see them as well. In all likelihood we will never have this chance again. take it while you can.
2004-01-16
Part 3: It's Not Really the Thought that Counts
Just as Peter Jackson felt that LOTR had to be made as one large, three-part, cinematic piece, I decided to write my IMDb review of all three movies as a single, multi-part essay. Click on my screen-name and hit "Chronological" to view my reviews of the Fellowship and Two Towers. I make no guarantees about the quality and consistence of my review, but I do guarantee that these three films offer very high and very consistent quality from beginning to end. The acting, cinematography, art, and direction simply can not be beat.

Which of the three movies is my favorite varies with my mood – and the same holds true for Tolkien's books. When I am immersed in the story, ROTK is my favorite. When I simply want to have fun with the whole experience, I love Fellowship. And when I want something intense, evocative and thoughtful, I go for the Two Towers.

Frodo, Sam and Golem are on their way to Mount Doom and their bodies, nerves, and relationships have borne the greatest burden on middle earth. The rest of the fellowship is rallying to the defense of Minas Tirith, and preparing for even more deadly battles to come.

The heroism and romance are incredibly moving - when was the last time you saw an entire audience leaving a theater after a fantasy movie rubbing their eyes? The sets are breathtaking - even moreso than in the previous two films.

The casting and acting are superb.

The film delivers at every level and is the jewel in the trilogy's well-earned crown.

Return of the King offers a resolution of all of the major story arcs in LOTR. As with the classic Tolkien trilogy, however, you may be able to predict some of what will occur, but never all of it and you'll never guess how you will get there. The same fatalistic and paradoxically unpredictable feeling of Tolkien's grand plots is present throughout ROTK especially. The major theme in ROTK, however, is the varied ways and means of heroism – both intentional and unintended, and Tolkien's examination of sacrifice and heroism is as inspiring as it is subtle. Amazingly, it all comes through in the films.

Even more than the previous two films, Jackson and his writers took liberties with the story-line. Like the others, however, this serves the film better than simple adaptation from one medium to another. By reordering some of the chronology and adding scenes and plot devices which are consistent with Tolkien's world and characterizations, the film-makers actually do a better job of preserving the concepts and themes of the story than they could have with a pure adaptation. The lengthy epilogue in Tolkien's book is greatly reduced, reordered, and somewhat changed in order to work in the film. Some parts actually appear very early in ROTK. And some aspects of Tolkien's epilogue are disclosed in the Two Towers, though not directly depicted. But all of the really important components of the epilogue are, at least strongly implied if not well illustrated in ROTK.
2007-11-30
📹 Purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie online, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King HD 720p download, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King the movie, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King download, characters in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King budget, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie download, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King Bluray purchase online, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King HD full movie online, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King HD online, Noel Appleby, Alexandra Astin, Sean Astin, David Aston, John Bach, Sean Bean, Cate Blanchett, Orlando Bloom, Billy Boyd, Sadwyn Brophy, Alistair Browning, Marton Csokas, Richard Edge, Jason Fitch, Bernard Hill The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 1080p, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 720p, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King direct link download, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King purchase download, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King full movie, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King full movie download, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King full movie free download, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King purchase movie 2003, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King full movie online, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King Drama, Action, Adventure, Fantasy online, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King purchase DVD 📀, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King USA, New Zealand, Germany, purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King download 720p, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King dual audio, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King HD Peter Jackson, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King good movie to purchase, purchase movies and download, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie 2003 purchase, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie available for purchase, purchase The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movie, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King real life, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King Noel Appleby, Alexandra Astin, Sean Astin, David Aston, John Bach, Sean Bean, Cate Blanchett, Orlando Bloom, Billy Boyd, Sadwyn Brophy, Alistair Browning, Marton Csokas, Richard Edge, Jason Fitch, Bernard Hill 📼, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King actors names, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King HD digital copies of movie, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King movies unlimited 🎞️.
×